<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Executive Marketing Blog &#187; customer disappointment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interimmarketing.info/tag/customer-disappointment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info</link>
	<description>A Blog for Marketing Executives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interim Executive Question: Can the Costs of Poor Brand Performance be Measured?</title>
		<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info/interim-executive-question-can-the-costs-of-poor-brand-performance-be-measured/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interimmarketing.info/interim-executive-question-can-the-costs-of-poor-brand-performance-be-measured/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OneAccord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer disappointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative perceptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interimmarketing.info/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  Can the costs  of poor brand performance be measured?
The cost of poor brand  performance is real and it can be measured.  The elements of cost  are tangible and often already measured by companies, including: rework,  error correction, concessions, lost opportunities, and customer attrition.    Each one of these elements increases [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question:  Can the costs  of poor brand performance be measured?</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" title="interim marketing executive" src="http://interimmarketing.info/images/gm.jpg" alt="" width="236" height="208" />The cost of poor brand  performance is real and it can be measured.  The elements of cost  are tangible and often already measured by companies, including: rework,  error correction, concessions, lost opportunities, and customer attrition.    Each one of these elements increases your cost of service, selling,  support, and overhead as remedies are implemented to correct them.   These costs can have an exponential impact across the transmission systems:   that is, each element or system that fails, or any inconsistency between  them or against the brand promise tends to compound the noise in the  communication and impact the perception of the customer.  Why is  there such a compounding effect?  Remember that for business to  business customers, the sum of all of their experiences and all the  communications with your entire firm over time serve to create their  perception of your brand.  When one element disappoints the customer,  it is automatically compounded by another element – even though they  may seem totally unconnected from inside your company.  Left unchecked,  the customer’s disappointment will grow and negative perceptions will  expand beyond simply the issues at hand to become a general perception  of your whole business.</p>
<p>While the cost of negative  brand efficiency may be difficult to measure precisely, the direct impact  of poor performance and quality on each of the communications systems  can be measured.  Many businesses have sophisticated processes,  software and even six sigma quality improvement programs designed to  measure and improve that performance and increase profitability.   These initiatives do not often measure systems across the enterprise  and rarely, if ever, do they measure the effectiveness and consistency  of communication and performance of all of these systems with the intended  brand strategy of the business.  Managing each one of those issues  in isolation and not in a holistic manner aligned with the brand strategy  will result in an exponential drain on energy and resources required  to deliver sustained profitable growth.</p>
<p><em>Photo via <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/jm3/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/flickr.com');">flickr</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interimmarketing.info/interim-executive-question-can-the-costs-of-poor-brand-performance-be-measured/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
