<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Executive Marketing Blog &#187; Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interimmarketing.info/category/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info</link>
	<description>A Blog for Marketing Executives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Finding Profitable Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info/finding-profitable-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interimmarketing.info/finding-profitable-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OneAccord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Marketing Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revenue Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interim marketing executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideal client profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interimmarketing.info/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When working with company‘s that have sales revenue and profit challenges one of the first places to look and diagnose the root cause is within their sales numbers, specifically the sales pipeline. The sales pipeline typically reveals the symptoms associated with the revenue and profit challenges a company is currently experiencing or will experience. One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" title="interim marketing executive" src="http://interimmarketing.info/images/appletattoo.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" />When working with company‘s that have sales revenue and profit challenges one of the first places to look and diagnose the root cause is within their sales numbers, specifically the sales pipeline. The sales pipeline typically reveals the symptoms associated with the revenue and profit challenges a company is currently experiencing or will experience. One key metric to examine is the win rate, which is the total revenue sold divided by the total revenue sold, lost and disengaged. The win rate percentage provides a factored view and insight into predicting a company‘s future sales performance. Conversely, it also reveals areas of deficiency that are impacting or will impact sales performance. Another key area is looking at how opportunities enter the pipeline. Do they enter from demand creation (the proactive pursuit of sales revenue) or demand management (reactive pursuit or sales revenue from leads, referrals and bluebirds).  </p>
<p>Experience has shown that revenue challenged companies rely much more on demand management than on demand creation to generate sales revenue typically resulting in an unbalanced 80/20 split.  </p>
<p>Companies with an unbalanced and unpredictable revenue stream need to ask themselves the following question: Where do we want our sales revenue to come from?  When applying conventional wisdom, the answer to the question can be found by identifying your company‘s —ideal client profile“ or those clients most likely to receive significant value purchasing your product and/or service based on the alignment of qualifying characteristics and attributes between your company and the prospective client.  However, going a step beyond conventional wisdom and applying biblical wisdom can help you identify not only your most profitable clients but also your most sustainable clients. The biblical wisdom referenced is found in the book —Beyond Babel“ by Gerald R. Chester, Ph.D. regarding the biblical principle of equal yoking specifically related to C4 to identify your —ideal C4 client.“  </p>
<p>Since most companies typically do not select their clients, it is even more difficult to find C4 clients. The components of C4 include a company‘s:<br />
<strong>1. Calling </strong><br />
<strong>2. Character </strong><br />
<strong>3. Capabilities </strong><br />
<strong>4.Commissioning</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Calling Speaks to the heart of the company. </strong><br />
Will your value proposition bring lasting value to the prospective client? </p>
<p><strong>Character Is the accepted worldview of a company. </strong><br />
Does the prospective client‘s company values and operating principles align with your company?  </p>
<p><strong>Capabilities A company‘s ability to assess the value proposition.  </strong><br />
Do your services and/or products facilitate the successful completion of tasks or business challenges that can‘t be effectively addressed by your prospective client?  </p>
<p><strong>Commissioning The external invitation and permission to speak into a client.</strong><br />
Do you have the affirmation and confidence to fulfill your client‘s needs? </p>
<p>In conclusion, the alignment of C4 between your company and your prospective client(s) will not only help establish your most profitable C4 relationships but will also build a sustainable and predictable revenue stream  </p>
<p><em>Need help growing revenues? Contact an interim marketing executive today at info@oneaccordpartners.com or visit <a title="interim marketing executive" href="http://www.oneaccordpartners.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.oneaccordpartners.com');">www.oneaccordpartners.com</a>.</em> </p>
<p><em>Photo via <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/bboyredcel/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/flickr.com');">flickr</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interimmarketing.info/finding-profitable-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Gates/Seinfeld Went Viral and &#8216;I&#8217;m a PC&#8217; Ads Didn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info/microsofts-gatesseinfeld-went-viral-and-im-a-pc-ads-didnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interimmarketing.info/microsofts-gatesseinfeld-went-viral-and-im-a-pc-ads-didnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OneAccord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm a PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interimmarketing.info/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Visible Measures, which charts online video viewing trends and has measured the videos associated with Microsoft&#8217;s $300 million ad campaign, the Seinfeld/Gates ads are squashing the &#8220;I&#8217;m a PC&#8221; ads by a margin of 4.3 million viral video views. Both ads had about equal video placements (about 75 each).
Visible Measures points out that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Visible Measures, which charts online video viewing trends and has measured the videos associated with Microsoft&#8217;s $300 million ad campaign, the <a title="advertising strategy" href="http://www.visiblemeasures.com/news-and-events/blog/bid/6828/Microsoft-s-Viral-Video-Adventure-Seinfeld-Gates-vs-I-m-a-PC" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.visiblemeasures.com');">Seinfeld/Gates ads are squashing the &#8220;I&#8217;m a PC&#8221; ads</a> by a margin of 4.3 million viral video views. Both ads had about equal video placements (about 75 each).</p>
<p>Visible Measures points out that while the <a title="advertising strategy" href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=130939" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/adage.com');">Seinfeld/Gates clips</a> came out two weeks earlier than the <a title="I'm a PC ads" href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=131102" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/adage.com');">&#8220;I&#8217;m a PC&#8221; ads</a>, Seinfeld/Gates drew twice as many viewers their first week in market than the PC ads did.</p>
<p>After two weeks in market, Visible Measures says, &#8220;Seinfeld/Gates was still collecting more than 700,000 views per day, while the &#8216;I&#8217;m a PC&#8217; clips had tapered off to less than 50,000 views per day.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why might this be?</p>
<p>Microsoft sparked a dialogue in the Seinfeld ad that isn&#8217;t there in PC ads.</p>
<p>&#8220;So much viral video is basically word of mouth. And when you build in question into the creative, it gives people something to talk about,&#8221; said Matt Cutler, VP-marketing and analytics at Visible Measures Corp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interimmarketing.info/microsofts-gatesseinfeld-went-viral-and-im-a-pc-ads-didnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s US Share Of Web Search Reaches 63%</title>
		<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info/googles-us-share-of-web-search-reaches-63/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interimmarketing.info/googles-us-share-of-web-search-reaches-63/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OneAccord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interimmarketing.info/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco (Reuters) &#8211; Google extended an already wide lead in the U.S. web search to 63.0% share of the market in August, its biggest monthly gain in five months.  Yahoo Inc, the No. 2 player in the U.S. web search market saw its share of the business drop 0.9% to 19.6% from July [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Francisco (Reuters) &#8211; Google extended an already wide lead in the U.S. web search to 63.0% share of the market in August, its biggest monthly gain in five months.  Yahoo Inc, the No. 2 player in the U.S. web search market saw its share of the business drop 0.9% to 19.6% from July while Microsoft, the No. 3 U.S. player, slipped 0.6% to 8.3%, according to comScore Inc.</p>
<p>IAC InterActiveCorp&#8217;s Ask.com grew 0.3% to retain its fourth-place ranking while Time Warner Inc&#8217;s AOL edged up 0.1% to 4.3%, according to August monthly data published by the market research firm said.<br />
Google&#8217;s growing share of web search and, by extension, its even larger role in the related market for web search advertising, has lead rivals and some industry trade groups to complain to competition regulators in the United and Europe.</p>
<p>ComScore estimates that the number of searches performed by U.S. web surfers on the five top search engines was virtually unchanged at 11.75 billion searches compared with July. The figure excludes searches users perform for mapping, local directory information or user-generated videos.</p>
<p>Click Here to <a title="executive marketing" href="http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;orgId=101735&amp;topicId=101800040&amp;docId=l:857727113&amp;start=3" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www6.lexisnexis.com');">Read Full Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interimmarketing.info/googles-us-share-of-web-search-reaches-63/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Display vs Search</title>
		<link>http://www.interimmarketing.info/display-vs-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interimmarketing.info/display-vs-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OneAccord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interimmarketing.info/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If display advertising and search advertising were brothers, display would be known as the black sheep. Marketers tend to view display as an ineffective online-advertising medium with results that are not easily measurable. However, new studies are being released which suggest that display advertising could have more impact than given credit for.
WSJ reports, &#8220;The debate revolves around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If display advertising and search advertising were brothers, display would be known as the black sheep. Marketers tend to view display as an ineffective online-advertising medium with results that are not easily measurable. However, new studies are being released which suggest that display advertising could have more impact than given credit for.</p>
<p>WSJ reports, &#8220;The debate revolves around what leads consumers to take actions on the Web: buying something, printing a coupon or visiting a Web site. Up to now, most advertisers judged the effectiveness of an ad campaign by what consumers did after they clicked on the ad. But some marketers say they are now using research not only from Microsoft, but also independent Web-measurement firms like comScore and Omniture, to figure out what happens before people click on ads &#8212; even in situations where they don&#8217;t end up actually clicking on the ads.</p>
<p>The major conclusion of this research: By the time consumers search for a product or service, they&#8217;ve often already made up their minds to buy it. And display ads are often an important factor in their reaching that conclusion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interimmarketing.info/display-vs-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
